Re: dyntest.pgc not working in 7.4 ? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Seum-Lim Gan
Subject Re: dyntest.pgc not working in 7.4 ?
Date
Msg-id p05100368bbfd3bc03473@[192.168.10.94]
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: dyntest.pgc not working in 7.4 ?  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: dyntest.pgc not working in 7.4 ?  (Michael Meskes <meskes@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-bugs
Hi Michael,

This is how we build dyntest:

/platdb/bin/ecpg -I /platdb/include -o dyntest74.c dyntest.pgc
cc -I/platdb/include -R/platdb/lib -L/platdb/lib -lecpg -o
lucyDyntest74 dyntest74.c


The cc here is the Sun Workshop compiler.

Thanks.

Gan

At 10:03 pm +0100 2003/12/10, Michael Meskes wrote:
>On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:50:39PM -0600, Seum-Lim Gan wrote:
>>  We compiled the dyntest.pgc (in src/interfaces/ecpg/test)
>>  and tried it out but it seems like it is not able to
>>  stop after reading the last record and keep going on
>>  forever. sqlcode return is always 0 and never get to 100
>>  where it is supposed to. The dyntest.pgc has not changed from
>>  7.3.4 to 7.4 and it used to work in 7.3.4.
>
>Do you use any special options to ecpg?
>
>I just tried with CVS HEAD and it runs without a problem. Albeit on an
>empty database just showing the system tables.
>
>Anyone else having problems with this test case?
>
>Michael
>--
>Michael Meskes
>Email: Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De
>ICQ: 179140304, AIM/Yahoo: michaelmeskes, Jabber: meskes@jabber.org
>Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!


--
+--------------------------------------------------------+
| Seum-Lim GAN                 email : slgan@lucent.com  |
| Lucent Technologies                                    |
| 2000 N. Naperville Road, 6B-403F  tel : (630)-713-6665 |
| Naperville, IL 60566, USA.        fax : (630)-713-7272 |
|       web : http://inuweb.ih.lucent.com/~slgan         |
+--------------------------------------------------------+

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: dyntest.pgc not working in 7.4 ?
Next
From: Arnold Mavromatis
Date:
Subject: Re: TimeZone bug again.....